In the third chapter of his book, Surfing the Tsunami: An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Options for Responding, Kelsey frames three perspectives for weighing the influence of artificial intelligence on the present and future job market. Independent of whether you view AI positively or cynically, Kelsey argues that “no one should be passive.”
According to Kelsey, the impact of AI can be seen with optimism,
pessimism, or realism or, for some, an aggregate of or progression through all
three points of view.
For the optimist, Kelsey suggests a few questions when
approaching data. For example, do you think that the integration of artificial intelligence
will have immediate or delayed? While the workplace has steadily adopted distinct
types of technology over time, in recent years the pace of adoption of
technologies like the inclusion of cloud computing or the use of
Along with Kelsey’s considerations for optimists, he also
offers points for pessimists to ponder. For example, can the growing role of artificial
intelligence and automation lead to the creation of more jobs for jobseekers. Like
government and private sector initiatives to drive the creation of green jobs at
the turn of the 21st century, can a similar push be made for “[investments]
in workforce redevelopment [and] infrastructure” that nurtures a robust job
market?
Ultimately, Kelsey advocates for a measured, realistic
response to the mushrooming of artificial intelligence. Rather than being overly hopeful or cynical about
the potential outcome of AI’s influence, Kelsey suggests a less reactionary
response. For example, “’adapting’ and learning more” about artificial intelligence,
“adopting AI” when the opportunity arises, and becoming “adept” in AI.
No comments:
Post a Comment